lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1461666585-11306-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:29:45 +0100
From:	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] regulator: core: Add early supply resolution for regulators

The call to set_machine_constraints() in regulator_register(), will
attempt to get the voltage for the regulator. If a regulator is in
bypass will fail to get the voltage (ie. it's bypass voltage) and
hence register the regulator, because the supply for the regulator has
not been resolved yet.

To fix this, add a call to regulator_resolve_supply() before we call
set_machine_constraints(). If the call to regulator_resolve_supply()
fails, rather than returning an error at this point, allow the
registration of the regulator to continue because for some regulators
resolving the supply at this point may not be necessary and it will be
resolved later as more regulators are added. Furthermore, if the supply
is still not resolved for a bypassed regulator, this will be detected
when we attempt to get the voltage for the regulator and an error will
be propagated at this point.

If a bypassed regulator does not have a supply when we attempt to get
the voltage, rather than returing -EINVAL, return -EPROBE_DEFER instead
to allow the registration of the regulator to be deferred and tried
again later.

Please note that regulator_resolve_supply() will call
regulator_dev_lookup() which may acquire the regulator_list_mutex. To
avoid any deadlocks we cannot hold the regulator_list_mutex when calling
regulator_resolve_supply(). Therefore, rather than holding the lock
around a large portion of the registration code, just hold the lock when
aquiring any GPIOs and setting up supplies because these sections may
add entries to the regulator_map_list and regulator_ena_gpio_list,
respectively.

Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index a9c731cdaeeb..ec8184d53f13 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3148,8 +3148,11 @@ static int _regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 			return ret;
 		if (bypassed) {
 			/* if bypassed the regulator must have a supply */
-			if (!rdev->supply)
-				return -EINVAL;
+			if (!rdev->supply) {
+				rdev_err(rdev,
+					 "bypassed regulator has no supply!\n");
+				return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+			}
 
 			return _regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply->rdev);
 		}
@@ -3965,8 +3968,6 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 		rdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(config->of_node);
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
-
 	mutex_init(&rdev->mutex);
 	rdev->reg_data = config->driver_data;
 	rdev->owner = regulator_desc->owner;
@@ -3991,7 +3992,9 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 
 	if ((config->ena_gpio || config->ena_gpio_initialized) &&
 	    gpio_is_valid(config->ena_gpio)) {
+		mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 		ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
+		mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 		if (ret != 0) {
 			rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO%d: %d\n",
 				 config->ena_gpio, ret);
@@ -4009,31 +4012,40 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 	if (init_data)
 		constraints = &init_data->constraints;
 
-	ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto wash;
-
 	if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
 		rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
 	else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
 		rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
 
+	/*
+	 * Attempt to resolve the regulator supply, if specified,
+	 * but don't return an error if we fail because we will try
+	 * to resolve it again later as more regulators are added.
+	 */
+	if (regulator_resolve_supply(rdev))
+		rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve supply\n");
+
+	ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto wash;
+
 	/* add consumers devices */
 	if (init_data) {
+		mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 		for (i = 0; i < init_data->num_consumer_supplies; i++) {
 			ret = set_consumer_device_supply(rdev,
 				init_data->consumer_supplies[i].dev_name,
 				init_data->consumer_supplies[i].supply);
 			if (ret < 0) {
+				mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 				dev_err(dev, "Failed to set supply %s\n",
 					init_data->consumer_supplies[i].supply);
 				goto unset_supplies;
 			}
 		}
+		mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
-
 	ret = device_register(&rdev->dev);
 	if (ret != 0) {
 		put_device(&rdev->dev);
@@ -4050,13 +4062,16 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 	return rdev;
 
 unset_supplies:
+	mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	unset_regulator_supplies(rdev);
+	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 wash:
 	kfree(rdev->constraints);
+	mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	regulator_ena_gpio_free(rdev);
+	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 clean:
 	kfree(rdev);
-	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	kfree(config);
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
-- 
2.1.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ