linux-kernel - Re: Applied "regulator: rk808: remove unused rk808_reg_ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6388946.roQG2iRI70@wuerfel>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:38:43 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@...tec.de>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Applied "regulator: rk808: remove unused rk808_reg_ops_ranges" to the regulator tree

On Tuesday 26 April 2016 11:26:44 Mark Brown wrote:
> The patch
> 
>    regulator: rk808: remove unused rk808_reg_ops_ranges
> 
> has been applied to the regulator tree at
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 


As Wadim Egorov just said a few minutes earlier, my patch was apparently
not the correct fix for his mistake. This means he will now have to
submit another fix on top of mine, right?

	Arnd