lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:15:48 +0100 From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> Cc: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:31:07PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2016/4/26 0:47, David Daney wrote: > >On 04/25/2016 04:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > >>On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:40:25PM -0700, David Daney wrote: > >>>From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com> > >>> > >>>Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this patch > >>>set introduce the ACPI based configuration to provide NUMA > >>>information. > >>> > >>>ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the > >>>NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table, so parse those two > >>>tables to get mappings from cpu/mem to numa node configuration and > >>>system locality. > >> > >>Whilst I've queued the main NUMA series for arm64, I'd really like to > >>see more movement on the generic header file cleanups that you posted > >>separately: > >> > >>http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456358528-24213-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com > >> > > > >FWIW: Those patches should still apply. I am carrying them in my > >development trees, and have not changed them in any way. What's your plan for getting them merged? > >>Given that this ACPI series already requires some significant cross-arch > >>interaction (which is actually good!), perhaps extending the clean-up > >>patches to encompass some of the ACPI bits might make sense, and we can > >>get that queued as a pre-requisite. > > > >The cleanup patches you mention above are really independent of the ACPI > >things. I have applied them both before and after the ACPI patches, and > >both seem to work. With a quick perusal of the ACPI patches nothing > >jumps out at me as being a candidate for inclusion in the header file > >cleanup series. > > I agree. My patch set is ACPI related enablement, cleanups and > consolidations, it would be good to merge as a single patch set > as it's self-contained. Up to you. I just thought you might want to avoid having two sets of cross-arch changes and the associated merging headaches that go with that. Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists