linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Net driver bugs fix and code style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <HE1PR05MB162505BA06C409CB3C52850AAA630@HE1PR05MB1625.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:23:26 +0000
From:	Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"abrodkin@...opsys.com" <abrodkin@...opsys.com>,
	Elad Kanfi <eladkan@...lanox.com>,
	Tal Zilcer <talz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Net driver bugs fix and code style

>From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 6:57 PM

>It is not appropriate to mix coding style fixes with bug fixes.
The code style in patch number 1 is actually prevents code duplication that stem from bug fix at patch number 3. 

>Bug fixes must be targetted at the 'net' tree, and anything else
>must be targetted at the 'net-next' tree.
Should we handle bugs fix first (more urgent then code style) and once it will be accepted and applied to net-next proceed with the code style patch?

Noam