lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160426181018.GA16601@linux-uzut.site>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:10:18 -0700
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:	"Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@...il.com>
Cc:	Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: partitions: efi: Always check for alternative GPT
 at end of drive

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:

>At the absolute minimum, we should be logging (at least at a warning 
>level) that we had to fall back the the backup GPT.  If somebody is 
>dealing with a disk that had a torn write to the primary GPT, that's 
>one thing, but this could also be caused by any number of other 
>problems (hardware issues, malicious intent, etc), and we need to log 
>that we detected corrupted data.

We already complain about corrupted primary gpt (at a warn level), and
there's also plenty of verbosity about differences between primary and
backup (see compare_gpts()), or are you referring to something else?

Thanks,
Davidlohr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ