linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 84/93] pinctrl: single: Fix pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry to use _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1461694653-29506-85-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:17:24 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 84/93] pinctrl: single: Fix pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry to use __ffs than ffs

4.2.8-ckt9 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>

commit 56b367c0cd67d4c3006738e7dc9dda9273fd2bfe upstream.

pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry uses ffs which gives bit indices
ranging from 1 to MAX. This leads to a corner case where we try to request
the pin number = MAX and fails.

bit_pos value is being calculted using ffs. pin_num_from_lsb uses
bit_pos value. pins array is populated with:

pin + pin_num_from_lsb.

The above is 1 more than usual bit indices as bit_pos uses ffs to compute
first set bit. Hence the last of the pins array is populated with the MAX
value and not MAX - 1 which causes error when we call pin_request.

mask_pos is rightly calculated as ((pcs->fmask) << (bit_pos - 1))
Consequently val_pos and submask are correct.

Hence use __ffs which gives (ffs(x) - 1) as the first bit set.

fixes: 4e7e8017a8 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules")
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 9b24b343..99835c1 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1273,9 +1273,9 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
 
 		/* Parse pins in each row from LSB */
 		while (mask) {
-			bit_pos = ffs(mask);
+			bit_pos = __ffs(mask);
 			pin_num_from_lsb = bit_pos / pcs->bits_per_pin;
-			mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << (bit_pos - 1));
+			mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << bit_pos);
 			val_pos = val & mask_pos;
 			submask = mask & mask_pos;
 
@@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "pinctrl-single,function-mask",
 				   &pcs->fmask);
 	if (!ret) {
-		pcs->fshift = ffs(pcs->fmask) - 1;
+		pcs->fshift = __ffs(pcs->fmask);
 		pcs->fmax = pcs->fmask >> pcs->fshift;
 	} else {
 		/* If mask property doesn't exist, function mux is invalid. */
-- 
2.7.4