[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5721425D.5050606@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:51:09 -0700
From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@...il.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] staging: lustre: ldlm: use accessor macros for
l_flags
Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a
lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this
message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the
remnant to Seagate. Consequently, I don't really follow Lustre any
more. Sorry.
On 04/27/16 15:20, James Simmons wrote:
> From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@...il.com>
>
> Convert most of the ldlm lock's l_flags references from direct
> bit twiddling to using bit specific macros. A few multi-bit
> operations are left as an exercise for the reader.
>
> The changes are mostly in ldlm, but also in llite, osc and quota.
> Also add a multi-bit (mask) test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@...il.com>
> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-2906
> Reviewed-by: Keith Mannthey <Keith.Mannthey@...el.com>
> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7963
> Reviewed-by: Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
> ---
> .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h | 3 +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists