linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: tmp006: Set correct iio name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADO9-pdJF8KKAB0c2KyWABqOdZ0BfwfrNpkhzeMv-95FrWn7SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:42:41 +0800
From:	Yong Li <sdliyong@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
Cc:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Crestez Dan Leonard <cdleonard@...il.com>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Krzysztof Kozłowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Matt Ranostaj <mranostay@...il.com>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: tmp006: Set correct iio name

Thanks for your mails. Is it possible to just merge this patch, then
test if there is any application is using it?  Considering almost all
other I2C devices are using the correct ID name, it should be low
risky

Yong

2016-04-26 23:21 GMT+08:00 Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Yong Li <sdliyong@...il.com> wrote:
>> I am thinking if there is any application is using this incorrect
>> name, the application should be fix too
>
> The rule is: "Don't break the userspace ABI". So, if we got this wrong
> from the beginning we are stuck with this name.
>
> The only thing that can save the situation is to know that there is no
> application relying on the name :).