linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: VInCo: fix phy reset gpio flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:15:40 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: VInCo: fix phy reset gpio flag

Le 26/04/2016 20:27, Sergei Shtylyov a écrit :
> On 04/26/2016 08:17 PM, David Miller wrote:
> 
>>> I plan to queue this patch through arm-soc for 4.7.
>>
>> Ok.
> 
>     How about this patch going thru your net-next repo instead?
> I'd like to keep the kernel bisectable... if my phylib/macb patches get merged 
> earlier than this one, that board would be broken...

Sergei, David,

I don't think that there is a big risk for this board to be tested in
the meantime as it's not widely deployed yet.
And as I'm aware of the issue and basically maintaining this DT file, I
think that I'll be informed if people try an unlikely arrangement of
patches on this board.

So either way, I'm okay. But I do think it's not worth thinking too much
about this case.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre