[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160427094410.GJ3264@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:44:10 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
tony.luck@...el.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org, jejb@...isc-linux.org,
deller@....de, benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
dalias@...c.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com, rth@...ddle.net,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: char: legacy RTC cleanups
On 26/04/2016 at 23:44:04 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> I've had these patches in my tree for a while, after the first one
> had a few issues that are fixed in this new version. The old-style
> PC RTC driver is now also disabled on m68k (as pointed out by
> Geert), ppc (it was also blacklisted), and m32r (I showed that
> it did not build).
>
> For the genrtc driver, rearranging the headers makes it simpler
> to use and reduces duplication. In case of alpha and mn10300,
> I've shown that the genrtc and rtc drivers are doing the same
> thing, so we don't need them both. The remaining three
> architectures (m68k, parisc, powerpc) actually all support
> the newer rtc-generic driver, so we could remove genrtc completely
> if we want to.
>
Personally, I'd go for the kill and remove genrtc instead of cleaning it
up.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists