| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20160427111758.GA6234@red-moon>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:17:58 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, arnd@...db.de,
will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
hanjun.guo@...aro.org, okaya@...eaurora.org,
jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, jchandra@...adcom.com,
robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com, mw@...ihalf.com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com,
wangyijing@...wei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
msalter@...hat.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
jcm@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 02/13] pci, acpi: Provide generic way to assign bus
domain number.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:26:49PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> > As we now have valid PCI host bridge device reference we can
> > introduce code that is going to find its bus domain number using
> > ACPI _SEG method.
> >
> > Note that _SEG method is optional, therefore _SEG absence means
> > that all PCI buses belong to domain 0.
> >
> > While at it, for the sake of code clarity we put ACPI and DT domain
> > assign methods into the corresponding helpers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
> > Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
> > Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> > Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>
> > Tested-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>
> > Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> > Tested-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
> > Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > index 4581e0e..d9a70c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -419,6 +419,24 @@ out:
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_osc_control_set);
> >
> > +int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(parent);
> > + unsigned long long segment = 0;
> > + acpi_status status;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If _SEG method does not exist, following ACPI spec (6.5.6)
> > + * all PCI buses belong to domain 0.
> > + */
> > + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi_dev->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> > + &segment);
>
> We already have code in acpi_pci_root_add() to evaluate _SEG. We
> don't want to evaluate it *twice*, do we?
>
> I was sort of expecting that if you added it here, we'd remove the
> existing call, but it looks like you're keeping both?
We can't remove the existing call, since it is used on X86 and IA64
to store the segment number that, in the process, is used in their
pci_domain_nr() arch specific callback to retrieve the domain nr.
On ARM64, that selects PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC, we have to find a way
to retrieve the domain number that is not arch dependent, since
this is generic code, we can't rely on any bus->sysdata format (unless
we do something like JC did below), therefore the only way is to call
the _SEG method *again* here, which also forced Tomasz to go through
the ACPI_COMPANION setting song and dance and pass the parent pointer
to pci_create_root_bus() (see patch 1), which BTW is a source of
trouble on its own as you noticed.
JC solved it differently, via sysdata and pseudo-generic code:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg478167.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg478169.html
I like neither, we need the lesser of two evils though.
Lorenzo
> > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> > + dev_err(&acpi_dev->dev, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> > +
> > + return segment;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
> > {
> > u32 support, control, requested;
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index 25e0327..1a74e87 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > #include <linux/log2.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_wakeup.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > @@ -4779,7 +4780,7 @@ int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
> > -void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
> > +static int of_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
> > {
> > static int use_dt_domains = -1;
> > int domain = -1;
> > @@ -4823,7 +4824,13 @@ void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
> > domain = -1;
> > }
> >
> > - bus->domain_nr = domain;
> > + return domain;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
> > +{
> > + bus->domain_nr = acpi_disabled ? of_pci_bus_domain_nr(parent) :
> > + acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(parent);
> > }
> > #endif
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> > index 89ab057..a72e22d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static inline acpi_status pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *dev)
> > {
> > return acpi_remove_pm_notifier(dev);
> > }
> > +extern int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct device *parent);
> > extern phys_addr_t acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(acpi_handle handle);
> >
> > static inline acpi_handle acpi_find_root_bridge_handle(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > @@ -109,6 +110,7 @@ extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[];
> > #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> > static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
> > static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
> > +static inline int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct device *parent) { return -1; }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists