[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1461759885-17163-4-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:24:44 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] mm, page_alloc: move might_sleep_if check to the allocator slowpath -revert
Vlastimil Babka pointed out that a patch weakens a zone_reclaim test
which while "safe" defeats the purposes of the debugging check. As most
configurations eliminate this check anyway, I thought it was better to
simply revert the patch instead of adding a second check in zone_reclaim.
This is a revert of the mmotm patch
mm-page_alloc-move-might_sleep_if-check-to-the-allocator-slowpath.patch .
Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 45a36e98b9cb..599bd1a49384 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3606,8 +3606,6 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
return NULL;
}
- might_sleep_if(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM);
-
/*
* We also sanity check to catch abuse of atomic reserves being used by
* callers that are not in atomic context.
@@ -3806,6 +3804,8 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_mask);
+ might_sleep_if(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM);
+
if (should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_mask, order))
return NULL;
--
2.6.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists