[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1461763453.20711.7.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:24:13 -0400
From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To: minyard@....org
Cc: openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPMI: reserve memio regions separately
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 23:31 -0500, minyard@....org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
>
> Commit d61a3ead2680 ("[PATCH] IPMI: reserve I/O ports separately")
> changed the way I/O ports were reserved and includes this comment in
> log:
>
> Some BIOSes reserve disjoint I/O regions in their ACPI tables for the IPMI
> controller. This causes problems when trying to register the entire I/O
> region. Therefore we must register each I/O port separately.
>
> There is a similar problem with memio regions on an arm64 platform
> (AMD Seattle). Where I see:
>
> ipmi message handler version 39.2
> ipmi_si AMDI0300:00: probing via device tree
> ipmi_si AMDI0300:00: ipmi_si: probing via ACPI
> ipmi_si AMDI0300:00: [mem 0xe0010000] regsize 1 spacing 4 irq 23
> ipmi_si: Adding ACPI-specified kcs state machine
> IPMI System Interface driver.
> ipmi_si: Trying ACPI-specified kcs state machine at mem \
> address 0xe0010000, slave address 0x0, irq 23
> ipmi_si: Could not set up I/O space
>
> The problem is that the ACPI core registers disjoint regions for the
> platform device:
>
> e0010000-e0010000 : AMDI0300:00
> e0010004-e0010004 : AMDI0300:00
>
> and the ipmi_si driver tries to register one region e0010000-e0010004.
>
> Based on a patch from Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
> ---
This works for me as well.
Tested-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> index 6ecf9af..a815044 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> @@ -1637,25 +1637,28 @@ static void mem_outq(const struct si_sm_io *io, unsigned int offset,
> }
> #endif
>
> -static void mem_cleanup(struct smi_info *info)
> +static void mem_region_cleanup(struct smi_info *info, int num)
> {
> unsigned long addr = info->io.addr_data;
> - int mapsize;
> + int idx;
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < num; idx++)
> + release_mem_region(addr + idx * info->io.regspacing,
> + info->io.regsize);
> +}
>
> +static void mem_cleanup(struct smi_info *info)
> +{
> if (info->io.addr) {
> iounmap(info->io.addr);
> -
> - mapsize = ((info->io_size * info->io.regspacing)
> - - (info->io.regspacing - info->io.regsize));
> -
> - release_mem_region(addr, mapsize);
> + mem_region_cleanup(info, info->io_size);
> }
> }
>
> static int mem_setup(struct smi_info *info)
> {
> unsigned long addr = info->io.addr_data;
> - int mapsize;
> + int mapsize, idx;
>
> if (!addr)
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -1692,6 +1695,21 @@ static int mem_setup(struct smi_info *info)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Some BIOSes reserve disjoint memory regions in their ACPI
> + * tables. This causes problems when trying to request the
> + * entire region. Therefore we must request each register
> + * separately.
> + */
> + for (idx = 0; idx < info->io_size; idx++) {
> + if (request_mem_region(addr + idx * info->io.regspacing,
> + info->io.regsize, DEVICE_NAME) == NULL) {
> + /* Undo allocations */
> + mem_region_cleanup(info, idx);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> * Calculate the total amount of memory to claim. This is an
> * unusual looking calculation, but it avoids claiming any
> * more memory than it has to. It will claim everything
> @@ -1700,13 +1718,9 @@ static int mem_setup(struct smi_info *info)
> */
> mapsize = ((info->io_size * info->io.regspacing)
> - (info->io.regspacing - info->io.regsize));
> -
> - if (request_mem_region(addr, mapsize, DEVICE_NAME) == NULL)
> - return -EIO;
> -
> info->io.addr = ioremap(addr, mapsize);
> if (info->io.addr == NULL) {
> - release_mem_region(addr, mapsize);
> + mem_region_cleanup(info, info->io_size);
> return -EIO;
> }
> return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists