lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:40:08 -0700
From:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@...aro.org>
CC:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devel@...ica.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/14] arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT
 and SLIT

On 04/27/2016 04:37 AM, Dennis Chen wrote:
> Hi Hanjun,
>
> Thanks for the clarification and some little comments ;-)
>
> On 27 April 2016 at 12:04, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Dennis, David,
>>
[...]
>>
>>
>> Yes, we can get such information in /sys/devices/system/node, I think
>> we can only print:
>>
>> ACPI: NUMA: SRAT: PXM x -> MPIDR y -> Node z
> Agree.

I am also in agreement.  I will send a revised patch that implements this.

Thanks,
David.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ