[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160428063018.GX7860@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:30:18 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
dianders@...omium.org, briannorris@...gle.com, smbarber@...gle.com,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
huangtao@...k-chips.com, eddie.cai@...k-chips.com,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] thermal: bang-bang governor: act on lower trip
boundary
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:54:26PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:02:47AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> >
> > With interrupt driven thermal zones we pass the lower and upper
> > temperature on which shall be acted, so in the governor we have to act on
> > the exact lower temperature to be consistent. Otherwise an interrupt maybe
> > generated on the exact lower temperature, but the bang bang governor does
> > not react.
>
> What is the expected impact on polling driven zones that use bang bang
> after this change?
Polling driven zones may have to be one step cooler before the governor
reacts, otherwise the behaviour should be unaffected.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists