[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5721CE20.6070801@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:47:28 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] mm, compaction: Abstract compaction feedback to
helpers
On 04/20/2016 09:47 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> Compaction can provide a wild variation of feedback to the caller. Many
> of them are implementation specific and the caller of the compaction
> (especially the page allocator) shouldn't be bound to specifics of the
> current implementation.
>
> This patch abstracts the feedback into three basic types:
> - compaction_made_progress - compaction was active and made some
> progress.
> - compaction_failed - compaction failed and further attempts to
> invoke it would most probably fail and therefore it is not
> worth retrying
> - compaction_withdrawn - compaction wasn't invoked for an
> implementation specific reasons. In the current implementation
> it means that the compaction was deferred, contended or the
> page scanners met too early without any progress. Retrying is
> still worthwhile.
>
> [vbabka@...e.cz: do not change thp back off behavior]
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists