[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7224042.xJrLyG5lxh@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:54:02 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bp@...e.de, poeschel@...onage.de,
treding@...dia.com, broonie@...nel.org, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
andreas.noever@...il.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch, jkosina@...e.cz,
sharon.dvir1@...l.huji.ac.il, joe@...ches.com, davem@...emloft.net,
james.hogan@...tec.com, michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kheitke@...ience.com,
mlocke@...eaurora.org, agross@...eaurora.org,
sheetal.tigadoli@...il.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/6] of/slimbus: OF helper for SLIMbus
On Wednesday 27 April 2016 17:58:05 Sagar Dharia wrote:
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> +/* OF helpers for SLIMbus */
> +static void of_register_slim_devices(struct slim_controller *ctrl)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node;
>
The #ifdef seems useless here, what kind of system would not have CONFIG_OF
enabled? I'd suggest merging this into patch 1 and removing the conditional
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists