lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:38:18 +0000
From:	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
CC:	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARC: [axs10x] Specify reserved memory for frame
 buffer

Hi Vineet,

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 19:26 +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2016 07:16 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Note that the IOC start alignment needs to follow
> > > > max(4k, size). What will be maximum size of frame buffer - 16M always !
> > What do you mean by that?
> For HS38, we intend to bypass the frame buffer traffic from IOC port. So the frame
> buffer start needs to be inside the IOC aperture base address. That value can't be
> arbitrary - it is atleast 4K aligned value and further also needs to be aligned to
> the size of aperture. So if the size is 16M it needs to be 16M aligned etc...

The point is we want to put frame buffer memory OUTSIDE IOC aperture.
So we allocate FB memory in the very end of DDR which is far away from IOC.

And in that case IOC alignment issues are out of the question here.

-Alexey

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ