linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable Samsung media platform drivers as modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3928cbfb-7c34-616a-30e4-ae000eecd63c@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:53:14 -0400
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable Samsung media
 platform drivers as modules

Hello,

On 04/28/2016 09:40 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> There are a bunch of media platform drivers under drivers/media/platform/
> that are for Samsung SoCs but are not being built with exynos_defconfig.
> 
> This patch enables them as a module to improve build coverage for these
> drivers and also to allow people use them with proper hardware if modules
> are installed. The S5P MFC driver wasn't enabled since it fails to probe.
> 
> Only the boolean Kconfig symbols are enabled as built-in, since drivers
> are not critical and also to keep the kernel binary image size as small
> as possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm resending the patches because Krzysztof pointed out that they didn't
> end in patchwork. Sorry for the noise.
> 
> I tested posting just to LKML (without people in cc) and the patches
> hit LKML this time as you can see in patchwork [0,1].
> 
> [0]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8970731/
> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8970711/
> 
> So, I'm posting again with people on cc, hopefully it will work this time.
>

Sigh, it didn't made to LKML again after adding the people as cc...

I don't know what's wrong, I get no errors on my side and is the company
mail server so I don't have access to the logs to see why are bouncing.

As I mentioned, the previous attempts without people in cc made it to LKML:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/28/424
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/28/422 

Krzysztof,

Is that enough for you to pick these? I'm so sorry for the inconvenience.

> Best regards,
> Javier
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America