linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/217] 3.16.35-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160428180728.GB4726@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:07:28 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Phil Jensen <pjensen@...rnote.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/217] 3.16.35-rc1 review

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.35 release.
> There are 217 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat Apr 30 22:00:00 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
Build results:
	total: 138 pass: 119 fail: 19
Failed builds:
	alpha:allmodconfig
	arc:allnoconfig
	arm:allmodconfig
	arm:imx_v6_v7_defconfig
	arm:shmobile_defconfig
	arm64:allmodconfig
	i386:allyesconfig
	i386:allmodconfig
	m68k:allmodconfig
	m68k:allnoconfig
	mips:allmodconfig
	parisc:allmodconfig
	powerpc:allmodconfig
	s390:allmodconfig
	sparc32:allmodconfig
	sparc64:allmodconfig
	x86_64:allyesconfig
	x86_64:allmodconfig
	xtensa:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:
	total: 98 pass: 93 fail: 5
Failed tests:
	arm:kzm:imx_v6_v7_defconfig
	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
	arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
	arm64:smp:defconfig
	arm64:nosmp:defconfig

A quick glance through the build results suggests that the build failures can
probably be fixed by pulling in a couple of missing patches. For the qemu tests,
I'll run a comparison against 3.16.7 to see if those are new failures.

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter