[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160429095958.007976da@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:59:58 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree
Hi Catalin,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
between commit:
06a71a24bae5 ("arm64: KVM: unregister notifiers in hyp mode teardown path")
from Linus' tree and commit:
67f691976662 ("arm64: kvm: allows kvm cpu hotplug")
from the arm64 tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
index dded1b763c16,1687e1450c3a..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
@@@ -1198,8 -1226,6 +1233,7 @@@ static void teardown_hyp_mode(void
free_hyp_pgds();
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
free_page(per_cpu(kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page, cpu));
- unregister_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb);
+ hyp_cpu_pm_exit();
}
static int init_vhe_mode(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists