[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160429062625.GA27916@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:26:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip
tree
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/efi.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 2c23b73c2d02 ("Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>")
>
> from the tip tree and commit:
>
> 9f2c36a7b097 ("include/linux/efi.h: redefine type, constant, macro from generic code")
>
> from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Btw., while looking at this, I noticed that akpm-current introduced this namespace
collision:
include/acpi/acconfig.h:#define UUID_STRING_LENGTH 36 /* Total length of a UUID string */
include/linux/uuid.h:#define UUID_STRING_LEN 36
I suspect the include/acpi/acconfig.h define should be renamed:
UUID_STRING_LENGTH -> ACPI_UUID_STRING_LENGTH
UUID_BUFFER_LENGTH -> ACPI_UUID_BUFFER_LENGTH
... before the collision causes any trouble.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists