[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5722AB6B.8060708@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:31:39 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] regulator: fixed: add support for ACPI interface
Hi,
On 04/29/2016 01:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:55:35PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>
>> How about below code?
>> + gpiod = gpiod_get(dev, "vbus_en", GPIOD_ASIS);
>> + if (IS_ERR(gpiod))
>> + return PTR_ERR(gpiod);
>> +
>> + config->gpio = desc_to_gpio(gpiod);
>> + config->enable_high = device_property_read_bool(dev,
>> + "enable-active-high");
>> + gpiod_put(gpiod);
>
> That looks reasonable, though if you use "gpio" as the name like DT you
> could keep the code the same which would be even better? Not super
> crticial though.
Systems might implement the name mapping in BIOS by implementing _DSD.
The "gpio" looks a little generic. I'd like to use a function specific name.
I will send a refreshed patch later.
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists