[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160429082501.GA20762@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:25:02 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:39:36AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> With considerable pain we just got rid of paravirt_enabled() in the
> x86 tree, and Xen is now reintroducing it in the EFI code.
I think Matt is working towards removing EFI_PARAVIRT but he'll comment
himself when he wakes up... :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists