[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1604291123260.3312@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:34:45 +0100 (BST)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Also, it would be nice to have all things EFI in a single tree, the conflicts are
> going to be painful! There's very little reason not to carry this kind of commit:
>
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 6 +++++
> drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 17 +++++++++-----
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> in the EFI tree.
That's true. I'll drop this commit from xentip and let Matt pick it up
or request changes as he sees fit.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists