[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160429094218.61b26849@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:42:18 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: don't include asm/mmu_context from drivers
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:52:32 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> This reverts the earlier fix attempt and works around the problem
> by including both linux/mmu_context.h and asm/mmu_context.h from
> kernel/sched/core.c. This is not a good solution but seems less
> hacky than the alternatives.
What about simply not compiling finish_arch_post_lock_switch() when
building modules?
(untested, not compiled or anything)
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index fa5b42d44985..3f22d1b6bac8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
}
+#ifndef MODULE
#define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
finish_arch_post_lock_switch
static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
@@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
preempt_enable_no_resched();
}
}
+#endif /* !MODULE */
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists