[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160429181248.GW19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:12:48 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: ulf.hansson@...aro.org, jh80.chung@...sung.com,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, stefan@...er.ch,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
jszhang@...vell.com, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vbyravarasu@...dia.com,
lars@...afoo.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
grundler@...omium.org, galak@...eaurora.org, lporzio@...ron.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, chaotian.jing@...iatek.com,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, sudeep.holla@....com,
zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Patches to allow consistent mmc / mmcblk
numbering w/ device tree
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This series picks patches from various different places to produce what
> I consider the best solution to getting consistent mmc and mmcblk
> ordering.
>
> Why consistent ordering and why not just use UUIDs? IMHO consistent
> ordering solves a few different problems:
NAK. Really. Use UUIDs, that's the proper solution here.
Exactly the same issue arises if you have more than one ATA or SCSI
adapter in your PC - things can be probed out of order and end up
in different /dev/sd* slots.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists