linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v5 3/4] gpio: move clps711x, moxart, ts4800 and gpio-ge into gpio-generic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 21:06:11 +0200
From:	Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 3/4] gpio: move clps711x, moxart, ts4800 and gpio-ge into gpio-generic

On Friday, April 29, 2016 04:18:20 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Christian Lamparter
> <chunkeey@...glemail.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch integrates these GPIO drivers into gpio-generic.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>
> 
> Very elegant. Let's wait for some feedback/ACKs from
> the driver maintainers, but this looks very nice.
Oh by the way: who's maintaining them? get_maintainer.pl just
lists the usual gpio people. I can try to add the module authors.
However, I don't know if these are working or dead. I ran into an
issue once (for something else) that I got the dreaded "delivery
notification failed" messages, but I can't rebroadcast them on the
ML (because that would be very silly).

Anyway, I'll rebase my patch series (without the two patches you
had already merged)

> Do you want to address Andy's optimization suggestion directly
> or as a follow-on patch?
Oh, this is a RFC. I didn't expect anything to be merged just yet.
Of course, I'll try to integrate his suggestion. I'll do that once
I reply to Rob/Mark/You about the "linux,gpio-mmio",
"memory-mapped-gpio" situation etc.

Regards,
Christian Lamparter