[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VgQX_EVhUUCugzv+CZqjzTS8LwyeU5419aX9FbDnWJDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:56:38 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Luca Porzio (lporzio)" <lporzio@...ron.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Patches to allow consistent mmc / mmcblk numbering
w/ device tree
Russell,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:39:35PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> [didn't read most of your reply]
>
>> Really I just reposted it several times because I notice that you seem
>> to ignore many points of my emails. I was really hoping to get you to
>> address this point. I notice that you still didn't. Either you are
>> just trying to annoy me, or you don't have an answer to how my patch
>> series hurts you.
>
> I don't see you treating Rob with the same contempt that you have
> treated me in this thread, despite Rob and myself both telling you
> basically the same thing.
Rob wrote a nice thoughtful reply and I tried to give a nice
thoughtful reply back to him. He raised some good points and I raised
some good points back to him. I look forward to his future thoughts
on the topic.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists