[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160430205640.GA9218@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:56:40 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org,
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parport: parport_pc: PCI SIO access should also depend
on SIO option
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:09:51PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
>
> CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_SUPERIO toggles Super IO chip support in parport_pc
> code, however only code accessing SIO chip via ISA (or LPC) bus was
> conditional on it.
>
> This patch makes SIO chip accesses via PCI bus also dependent on this
> config option.
>
> It should be noted that Super IO support in parport_pc is needed only when
> firmware has failed to make parallel port available either via PNP or
> on standard I/O ranges and user has one of a few supported SIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
> ---
>
> Hi Greg,
> This patch is not tested on any superio chip based hardware. (I also
> don't have one).
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2227051.html
>
> I know you dislike adding #ifdef so its upto you.
It's really a messy patch, surely there is a better solution.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists