[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5726203E.7060308@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 17:26:54 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
CC: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with
RCU_INIT_POINTER()
Am 30.04.2016 um 21:00 schrieb Muhammad Falak R Wani:
> The rcu_assign_pointer() ensures that the initialization of a structure
> is carried out before storing a pointer to that structre. It is always
> safe to use RCU_INIT_POINTER() to NULL a pointer, instead of
> rcu_assign_pointer().
> This results in slightly smaller/faster code.
Thanks for the detailed explanation, I was already wondering what the
difference is between the two.
>
> The following semantic patch was used:
> <smpl>
>
> @@
> @@
>
> - rcu_assign_pointer
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER
> (..., NULL)
>
> </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Regards,
Christian.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> index d81f1f4..4500ff1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void amdgpu_fence_process(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
>
> /* There is always exactly one thread signaling this fence slot */
> fence = rcu_dereference_protected(*ptr, 1);
> - rcu_assign_pointer(*ptr, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(*ptr, NULL);
>
> BUG_ON(!fence);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists