[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160501154855.GA24970@earth>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 17:48:56 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org,
aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: Nokia N900 retention mode in v4.6, camera buttons fun
Hi,
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 10:52:36AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2016-04-29 22:06:00, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:04:50PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > CONFIG_HSI breaks power management completely, so power management
> > > > with modem will be another topic.
> > >
> > > Sebastian, any idea why power management does not work for HSI?
> >
> > I wasn't aware, that pm_runtime_irq_safe() basically breaks runtime
> > PM until Tony's fix for musb (even though it's logical when thinking
> > about it). Currently omap-ssi and omap-ssi-port make use of
> > pm_runtime_irq_safe().
> >
> > Since pm_runtime_get_sync/pm_runtime_put_sync is called from
> > tasklets in omap-ssi (and omap-ssi-port) it cannot be simply
> > removed. So fixing PM for the ssi controller requires reworking
> > the driver in a non trivial way.
>
> I see latest series, and it also talks about frequency scaling. But I
> guess it is not going to fix this issue?
No, this is independent of the runtime PM problems. I also worked
on runtime PM/idling yesterday and pm_runtime_irq_safe is the main
culprit for breaking it (not the only one, though). It's not yet
finished though
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists