[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160501155239.GA19900@sophia>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 11:52:39 -0400
From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pnp: pnpbios: Add explicit X86_32 dependency to
PNPBIOS
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 01:51:19AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>On 4/11/2016 3:25 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>> The PNPBIOS driver requires preprocessor defines (located in
>> include/asm/segment.h) only declared if the architecture is set to
>> X86_32. If the architecture is set to X86_64, the PNPBIOS driver will
>> not build properly. The X86 dependecy for the PNPBIOS configuration
>> option is changed to an explicit X86_32 dependency in order to prevent
>> an attempt to build for an unsupported architecture.
>>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
>
>Has anyone taken care of this already?
>
>If not, can you possibly resend this patch with a CC to
>linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org so I can pick it up via Patchwork more easily?
I'm not sure when this patchset will appear in driver-core, so I have
resent this particular patch with a CC to linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org so
that Rafael J. Wysocki can pick it up more easily.
William Breathitt Gray
Powered by blists - more mailing lists