linux-kernel - Re: Nokia N900: Broken lirc ir-rx51 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57271246.1020000@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 May 2016 11:39:34 +0300
From:	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Timo Kokkonen <timo.t.kokkonen@....fi>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Nokia N900: Broken lirc ir-rx51 driver

Hi,

On  2.05.2016 10:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2016-04-22 15:49:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 January 2016 17:12:50 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> [160105 02:19]:
>>>> On Saturday 02 January 2016 09:06:57 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup please take a look at thread "[PATCH 0/3] pwm: omap: Add PWM support
>>>>> using dual-mode timers". Chances are we still need to set up the dmtimer
>>>>> code to provide also irqchip functions. That way ir-rx51.c can just do
>>>>> request_irq on the selected dmtimer for interrupts.
>>>>
>>>> No I see that patch from that thread uses dmtimer.h from plat-omap. So
>>>> it is really OK?
>>>
>>> It's using the header to populate the platform data in mach-omap2 so
>>> that's fine. But we do not want to directly expose the dmtimer functions
>>> to device drivers as they are not Linux generic at this point.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tony
>>
>> Hi Tony! Is there any progress for ir-rx51 driver? Months ago we were
>> waiting for some omap pwm patches... What is current state?
>
> Tony now posted patch series... it would be good to test them:
>

Hmm, I guess you've missed 
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg128465.html

Regards,
Ivo