[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160502093712.GE2274@localhost>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 15:07:12 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
sakato <ryusuke.sakato.bx@...esas.com>,
OSD2 ML <osd2@...renesas.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: rcar-dmac: use list_add() on rcar_dmac_desc_put()
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:50:04AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
>
> Current rcar_dmac_desc_put() is using list_add_tail() in order to
> push used descriptor to list of free descriptors, and next DMA transfer
> try to reuse it from this list. But because it is using *_tail(),
> this reuse effect can't be obtained without using all of them.
> For a longer-term solution, we should allocate hardware descriptors
> using GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_NOWAIT, but it is difficult today.
> This patch uses list_add() instead of list_add_tail() for short-term
> solution.
So how does reuse case help by not moving the descriptor to tail.
Also you are not reusing descriptor, you are reusing a descriptor memory,
these are two different things.
Lastly how does this help? Something doesn't seem right
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> index 02b86c6..616c63a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
> @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static void rcar_dmac_desc_put(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->lock, flags);
> list_splice_tail_init(&desc->chunks, &chan->desc.chunks_free);
> - list_add_tail(&desc->node, &chan->desc.free);
> + list_add(&desc->node, &chan->desc.free);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->lock, flags);
> }
>
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists