linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 [WARNING: at fs/dcache.c]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 May 2016 22:15:39 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2   [WARNING: at fs/dcache.c]

On (05/02/16 22:07), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
[..]
> > The issue is that 2 macros have the same value:
> > 
> > #define DCACHE_OP_REAL                  0x08000000
> > 
> > #define DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP               0x08000000 /* being looked up
> > (with parent locked shared) */
> > 
> > Verified with switching one to 0x10000000 and the warning went away.
> 
> This comes from a bad automatic merge resolution between commit
> 
>   d101a125954e ("fs: add file_dentry()")
> 
> from Linus' tree (introduced before v4.5-rc3) and commit
> 
>   340450a54573 ("beginning of transition to parallel lookups - marking in-lookup dentries")
> 
> from the vfs tree.
> 
> I will fix this up in tomorrow's tree (unless Al beats me to it).

good find, Mateusz.
thanks to both of you.

	-ss