[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1605021521120.3692@nanos>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 15:22:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/32] perf/x86/intel/cqm: integrate CQM cgroups with
scheduler
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
> In all those cases perf sched_out will call intel_cqm_event_stop that
> call pqr_cache_update_rmid that sets state->next_rmid to 0. The RMID 0
> corresponds to the root monr in the RMID hierarchy.
Folk, please stop top posting and trim your replies. This communication style
is a royal pain to read.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists