[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160502152442.GH6292@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 16:24:42 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.crestez@...el.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
Ge Gao <GGao@...ensense.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] iio: inv_mpu6050: Do burst reads using spi/i2c
directly
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 06:11:50PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much
easier to read and reply to.
> On 29/04/16 20:02, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
> > Using regmap_read_bulk is wrong because it assumes that a range of
> > registers is being read. In our case reading from the fifo register will
> > return multiple values but this is *not* auto-increment.
> > This currently works by accident.
> Cc'd Mark again. He's the regmap maintainer (amongst other things) so
> a series doing slightly odd things with regmap should probably have been
> cc'd to him in the first place.
> Perhaps regmap should have a repeat read function for this sort of fifo access?
> Mark, is this something you'd consider? Easy enough to implement after all as
> a variant on regmap_read_bulk...
> Having the below in a driver just feels wrong to me....
That doesn't sound like a crazy idea, please send patches for proposed
extensions.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists