[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160502154725.ckiewczbdubudyc7@floor.masoncoding.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 11:47:25 -0400
From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched: tweak select_idle_sibling to look for idle threads
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:58:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:50:04PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Oh btw, did you know single socket boxen have no sd_busy? That doesn't
> > look right.
>
> I suspected; didn't bother looking at yet. The 'problem' is that the LLC
> domain is the top-most, so it doesn't have a parent domain. I'm sure we
> can come up with something if we can get this all working right.
>
> And yes, I can get gains on various workloads with various options, I
> can even break all workloads, but I've so far completely failed on
> getting a win for everyone :/
Adding in the task_hot() check to decide if scanning idle was a good
idea ended up being really important. I'm happy to try a few variations
here as well, do you have a more recent patch?
-chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists