[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160502160250.GD24419@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 19:02:50 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Shutemov, Kirill" <kirill.shutemov@...el.com>,
"Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: mm: pages are not freed from lru_add_pvecs after process
termination
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 08:49:03AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 08:01 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:39:35PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 04/27/2016 07:11 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>> 6. Perhaps don't use the LRU pagevecs for large pages. It limits the
> >>> severity of the problem.
> >>
> >> I think that makes sense. Being large already amortizes the cost per base
> >> page much more than pagevecs do (512 vs ~22 pages?).
> >
> > We try to do this already, don't we? Any spefic case where we have THPs on
> > pagevecs?
>
> Lukas was hitting this on a RHEL 7 era kernel. In his kernel at least,
> I'm pretty sure THP's were ending up on pagevecs. Are you saying you
> don't think we're doing that any more?
As Vlastimil pointed, we do. It need to be fixed, I think.
Any volunteer? :-P
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists