linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: use RCU_INIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 May 2016 10:57:38 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@...il.com>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: use RCU_INIT_POINTER() when NULLing.

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:10:23AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:53:13PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 10:01:20AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 06:22:01PM +0530, Muhammad Falak R Wani wrote:
> > > > It is safe to use RCU_INIT_POINTER() to NULL, instead of
> > > > rcu_assign_pointer().
> > > > This results in slightly smaller/faster code.
> > > 
> > > If this is indeed the case, rcu_assign_pointer should simply check
> > > for NULL using __builtin_constant_p and do the right thing transparently
> > > instead of burdening it on every user.
> > 
> > Last time around, there was a compiler bug that prevented this from
> > working correctly.  But it could well be time to look at it again.
> > How does the following (untested) patch look?
> 
> Pretty bad, actually...
> 
> People use rcu_assign_pointer() for pointers to functions, which gets
> interesting compiler warnings for some configurations.  Please see below
> for attempt #2.

Perhaps third time is the charm?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 72a616bf7f99b2ef4f211f73c6def7fa884d6ca4
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Sun May 1 18:46:54 2016 -0700

    rcu: No ordering for rcu_assign_pointer() of NULL
    
    This commit does a compile-time check for rcu_assign_pointer() of NULL,
    and uses WRITE_ONCE() rather than smp_store_release() in that case.
    
    Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index c61b6b9506e7..9be61e47badc 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -650,7 +650,16 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
  * please be careful when making changes to rcu_assign_pointer() and the
  * other macros that it invokes.
  */
-#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER(v))
+#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
+({ \
+	uintptr_t _r_a_p__v = (uintptr_t)(v); \
+	\
+	if (__builtin_constant_p(v) && (_r_a_p__v) == (uintptr_t)NULL) \
+		WRITE_ONCE((p), (typeof(p))(_r_a_p__v)); \
+	else \
+		smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
+	_r_a_p__v; \
+})
 
 /**
  * rcu_access_pointer() - fetch RCU pointer with no dereferencing