linux-kernel - Re: GUP guarantees wrt to userspace mappings redesign

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 May 2016 19:41:14 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:	Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: GUP guarantees wrt to userspace mappings redesign

On 05/02, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 06:22:11PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> > > So we have pages pinned by a driver and the driver expects the pinned
> > > pages to be mapped into userspace, then __replace_page() kicks in and put
> > > different page there -- driver's expectation is broken.
> >
> > Yes... but I don't understand the problem space. I mean, I do not know why
> > this driver should expect this, how it can be broken, etc.
> >
> > I do not even understand why "initiated by other process" can make any
> > difference... Unless this driver somehow controls all threads which could
> > have this page mapped.
>
> Okay, my understanding is following:
>
> Some drivers (i.e. vfio) rely on get_user_page{,_fast}() to pin the memory
> and expect pinned pages to be mapped into userspace until the pin is gone.
> This memory is used to communicate between kernel and userspace.

Thanks Kirill.

Then I think uprobes should be fine,

> I don't think there's something to fix on uprobe side. It's part of
> debugging interface. Debuggers can be destructive, nothing new there.

Yes, exactly. And as for uprobes in particular, __replace_page() can
only be called of vma->vm_file and and the mapping is private/executable,
VM_MAYSHARE must not be set.

Unlikely userspace can read or write to this memory to communicate with
kernel or something else.

Thanks,

Oleg.