lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5727CE13.6090308@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 May 2016 15:00:51 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
	Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>,
	Alexander Popov <alpopov@...ecurity.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, gthelen@...gle.com,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, boot: Implement ASLR for kernel memory
 sections (x86_64)

On 05/02/2016 02:41 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> -#define __PAGE_OFFSET           _AC(0xffff880000000000, UL)
> +#define __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE      _AC(0xffff880000000000, UL)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
> +#define __PAGE_OFFSET           page_offset_base
> +#else
> +#define __PAGE_OFFSET           __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY */

Do you have any data about the performance impact of this change?  It's
not necessary to have it to merge something like this, I'm just curious
how bad it is.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ