[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8660uv2l40.fsf@hiro.keithp.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 08:54:07 -0700
From: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Dan Allen <dan@...ndevise.io>,
Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
"linux-media\@vger.kernel.org linux-media"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Graham Whaley <graham.whaley@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> writes:
> So sphinx/rst y/n? Jon, is that ok with you from the doc maintainer
> pov?
I think the right answer for today is to use sphinx to generate docs
From inline comments, to encourage outline docs to give it a try but to
allow doc writers to use whatever works for them.
That will leave the media docs using the existing system so that their
tables don't get wrecked, while providing guidance to new doc writers
and allowing inline docs to include markup.
--
-keith
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (811 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists