linux-kernel - Re: [tip:core/signals] signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the x86 sigaltstack check with other architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrVRkMBYxZUZAABOFfOESeqsBP6r+D3nN2a79hH=o4=YsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2016 09:12:16 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:core/signals] signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the
 x86 sigaltstack check with other architectures

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:49 AM, tip-bot for Stas Sergeev
<tipbot@...or.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID:  0b4521e8cf1f582da3045ea460427ac2f741578f
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0b4521e8cf1f582da3045ea460427ac2f741578f
> Author:     Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 23:20:02 +0300
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Tue, 3 May 2016 08:37:58 +0200
>
> signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the x86 sigaltstack check with other architectures
>
> Currently x86's get_sigframe() checks for "current->sas_ss_size"
> to determine whether there is a need to switch to sigaltstack.
> The common practice used by all other arches is to check for
> sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0
>
> This patch makes the code consistent with other architectures.
>
> The slight complexity of the patch is added by the optimization on
> !sigstack check that was requested by Andy Lutomirski: sas_ss_flags(sp)==0
> already implies that we are not on a sigstack, so the code is shuffled
> to avoid the duplicate checking.
>
> This patch should have no user-visible impact.

I'm late to the party, but LGTM.

--Andy