linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: DRA7x: dts: Update the OSC_32K

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5728E495.4010502@garmin.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2016 12:49:09 -0500
From:	"J.D. Schroeder" <Linux.HWI@...min.com>
To:	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <jay.schroeder@...min.com>,
	Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: DRA7x: dts: Update the OSC_32K_CLK frequency

On 05/03/2016 12:32 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> Personally I would not recommend using this clock for any timing sensitive
> applications. May I ask why you are interested in the exact clock rate of this
> clock anyway?

I'm not interested in using this clock and I'm not sure how anyone would use
this clock outside of the processor. See the inline comment that is part of
the change and the commit message for the change. There is no hint in my
change that this is an exact clock rate. It is a clarifying change to help
others avoid using this clock as a 32 kHz clock (which the current clock name
and frequency imply) and it more accurately represents the actual hardware
behavior.