[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8737pzlzfr.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 12:22:00 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: robert.foss@...labora.com, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
airlied@...ux.ie, aniel.vetter@...ll.ch, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
alexander.deucher@....com, daniels@...labora.com,
derekf@....samsung.com, varadgautam@...il.com
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.
robert.foss@...labora.com writes:
> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
>
> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
> update pending.
>
> Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
>
> * - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is
> * an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue
> * of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that.
> * Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a
> * synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the
> * commit in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
This looks good to me. Let's give it a few days on the list for any
other KMS folks to catch anything.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists