[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160503004247.GJ3492@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 17:42:47 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
arnd.bergmann@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] PM / OPP: -ENOSYS is applicable only to syscalls
On 04/27, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Some of the routines have used -ENOSYS for the cases where the
> functionality isn't implemented in the kernel. But ENOSYS is supposed to
> be used only for syscalls.
>
> Replace that with -ENOTSUPP, which specifically means that the operation
> isn't supported.
>
> While at it, replace exiting -EINVAL errors for similar cases to
> -ENOTSUPP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists