[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160503000556.111230952@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 17:10:45 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.5 046/200] futex: Handle unlock_pi race gracefully
4.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
commit 89e9e66ba1b3bde9d8ea90566c2aee20697ad681 upstream.
If userspace calls UNLOCK_PI unconditionally without trying the TID -> 0
transition in user space first then the user space value might not have the
waiters bit set. This opens the following race:
CPU0 CPU1
uval = get_user(futex)
lock(hb)
lock(hb)
futex |= FUTEX_WAITERS
....
unlock(hb)
cmpxchg(futex, uval, newval)
So the cmpxchg fails and returns -EINVAL to user space, which is wrong because
the futex value is valid.
To handle this (yes, yet another) corner case gracefully, check for a flag
change and retry.
[ tglx: Massaged changelog and slightly reworked implementation ]
Fixes: ccf9e6a80d9e ("futex: Make unlock_pi more robust")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460723739-5195-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/futex.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1212,10 +1212,20 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))
ret = -EFAULT;
- if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval))
+ if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
- else if (curval != uval)
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ } else if (curval != uval) {
+ /*
+ * If a unconditional UNLOCK_PI operation (user space did not
+ * try the TID->0 transition) raced with a waiter setting the
+ * FUTEX_WAITERS flag between get_user() and locking the hash
+ * bucket lock, retry the operation.
+ */
+ if ((FUTEX_TID_MASK & curval) == uval)
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ else
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
if (ret) {
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
return ret;
@@ -2536,6 +2546,15 @@ retry:
if (ret == -EFAULT)
goto pi_faulted;
/*
+ * A unconditional UNLOCK_PI op raced against a waiter
+ * setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit. Try again.
+ */
+ if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+ spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
+ put_futex_key(&key);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ /*
* wake_futex_pi has detected invalid state. Tell user
* space.
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists