linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.5 048/200] drm/nouveau/core: use vzalloc for allocating ramht

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160503000556.172497291@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon,  2 May 2016 17:10:47 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.5 048/200] drm/nouveau/core: use vzalloc for allocating ramht

4.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>

commit 78a121d82da8aff3aca2a6a1c40f5061081760f0 upstream.

Most calls to nvkm_ramht_new use 0x8000 as the size. This results in a
fairly sizeable chunk of memory to be allocated, which may not be
available with kzalloc. Since this is done fairly rarely (once per
channel), use vzalloc instead.

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Cc: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/ramht.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/ramht.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/ramht.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ nvkm_ramht_del(struct nvkm_ramht **pramh
 	struct nvkm_ramht *ramht = *pramht;
 	if (ramht) {
 		nvkm_gpuobj_del(&ramht->gpuobj);
-		kfree(*pramht);
+		vfree(*pramht);
 		*pramht = NULL;
 	}
 }
@@ -143,8 +143,8 @@ nvkm_ramht_new(struct nvkm_device *devic
 	struct nvkm_ramht *ramht;
 	int ret, i;
 
-	if (!(ramht = *pramht = kzalloc(sizeof(*ramht) + (size >> 3) *
-					sizeof(*ramht->data), GFP_KERNEL)))
+	if (!(ramht = *pramht = vzalloc(sizeof(*ramht) +
+					(size >> 3) * sizeof(*ramht->data))))
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	ramht->device = device;